• About
  • Projects & Research
  • Publications
  • Archives
  • Categories
  • Posts Tagged ‘Society’

    Causation and Mental Illness


    2010 - 04.08

    Anxiety, depression, dissociative identity disorder,

    Why am I talking about this?

    After a 2 year reprieve, I am back to being depressed.1

    And the question that pisses me off the most is, “why are you depressed?” Because if there’s a cause, there must be a cure! Find the magical traumatic event and my brain will start pumping chemicals correctly!

    … Wait.… I don’t think it works that way.

    And, perhaps, this misconception arose from the mental illness categorization. Physical illnesses almost always have a cause associated with them: typically a bacteria or virus. Physical illnesses have causes. Mental illnesses? The medical cause is attributed almost exclusively to chemical imbalances.

    B-B-But chemical imbalances are physical! Yes, yes they are.

    I don’t view my two years without a significant depressive episode as being “cured.” Nor is my current state a “regression” or “new case.” I am a person with depression. There isn’t a cure. I have good days and bad days with my level of depression (and anxiety, for that matter).

    Please don’t ask me for a cause. The cause is I’m effectively broken. Although, I prefer the existentialist answer of “because I am.”

    For those that recognize that depression is a chemical imbalance, they demand that I take pills. As if I am too depressed to realize I want or “need” to take medication. As if I hadn’t already considered it.

    As if I don’t have autonomy.

    1To be fair, it came back this summer and I just didn’t want to admit to myself that was the case. It has become increasingly severe, which is part of the reason why I haven’t blogged in a while. I didn’t feel like it. Presently, I’m forcing myself to do things that I used to enjoy.

    Brand Me


    2010 - 02.19

    My first years at university, I was a journalism advertising major. So, the inevitable question is how does one go from that to computer science?

    As a journalism major, it became quickly obvious that journalism (at least in the United States) has fallen quite far on the integrity scale. Today, it has gotten even worse. While The Daily Show, a comedy program, employs a full time fact checker, news organizations will employ one perhaps part time. Most mass media is owned by one of five megacorporations. Megacorporations that have other assets to promote and a profit-oriented view.

    So, I decided if I were to be evil, I just as well be honest about it. So, I switched to advertising. I really enjoyed the topic, particularly the discussions of intersections and media interactions. I love being creative and creating stories, which is the foundation of the creative area of advertising (as opposed to branding). My profs were great.

    But, my peers were a different story. I really did not have any thing in common with them. Even with advertising, I don’t want to just watch the ads. Advertising needs to earn my attention. And most did not seem to look past the surface while creating; to sell something you need to get in the mindset of the market.

    At this point, I stepped back and considered what I wanted and what had drawn me to advertising. It was telling stories. It was swapping my viewpoint with that of someone completely different; learning about socio-economic and cultural aspects of others. And there is something appealing about convincing someone that you have something that will genuinely make their life better.

    I decided I wanted to make the things that would be worthwhile. These things that advertising could be honest. And technology is where the world is innovating. So, engineering or computer science? Computer science just felt more right to me.

    The world is becoming ambient advertising. Even journalism, traditionally viewed as objective, has an angle; what new pandemic, book, sports team am I being sold now? Buses, sidewalks, television, movies, textbooks… all are subtly trying to sell me something.

    Let’s say it’s a free, open source tool. Alternative tools (which may have equal features) won’t be mentioned. And rarely, they’ll give me a reason why I need X feature. No one is even being paid in these cases.

    Word of mouth is the most effective and cheapest advertising medium available. It’s people that like your product or service to talk about it to others that trust this person’s judgement.

    People even advertise themselves: public versus private personas. And there may be more than one. What language do you use with children? Coworkers? Friends? Family? Doubt it’s the same across all of them. (I’d certainly get in trouble if my thoughts always got to my mouth.)

    Then, there’s the question of labels that are used. Despite building little embedded and alternative interface systems, I’m not about to call myself a “maker,” “hobbyist,” or “engineer.” These terms conjure images that I do not associate with even if they could be correct.

    … So, if the whole world is one big advertisement, how do you brand a person. First, we need to consider what branding is. No, not the kind involving a hot iron. Branding is an idea that is painted onto a commodity. Owning a Mac does not make a person creative. A sports car does not guarantee a fast (possibly reckless) driver. Having lung cancer doesn’t mean the person is a smoker and deserved it. All computers, cars, and cancers are more or less the same. Yet, we associate these things with social messages.

    So how do people brand? Well, I’ve been building the brand that is Alison since I came into existence. It’s not that I am creating one from scratch: I am just continuing my branding. (Think of Disney. When was that not about family entertainment?)

    While it is possible to rebrand a person, that’s increasingly difficult. A doctor isn’t going to become a shoe salesman easily. So, think on what you have and how to sell that. Let’s try dissecting me:

    • Person (I prefer human-first labeling)
      • Humor: Dry, sarcastic, and dark with occasional bad puns
      • Morals: Emphasizes integrity and being honest with oneself about immoral behavior
      • Animal lover: has pets and buys humane animal products
      • Creative: paints, writes, and creates projects
    • Computer scientist
      • Mixed advanced courses: diverse CS interests
      • Diversity work: wants equal opportunities for everyone
      • Tutor: knows material to be able to teach

    That’s a very basic one. I could go into being female, a person with a disability (with its subgroups), middle class, European-American, older child, being raised in diverse locations, enjoying Asian foods, being dairy-free etc. What of me is worth selling? Well, as with selling anything, it depends on who I’m selling to.

    Secondhand Sufferers


    2009 - 12.05

    I’ve stopped trying to find blogs by people that share by disabilities. Searching “[condition/label] blog” doesn’t send me to blogs of people with that condition or label (hell, I might not even get a blog). No, I get to see the ugliness that is “Secondhand Sufferers.”

    The concept of Secondhand Sufferers developed from several years of attempting to find blogs by people with attention deficit disorder. Rather than get blogs by people with ADD, I get bombarded by parents, teachers, doctors, and others affected by people with ADD. These typically refer to children with ADD and focus on the negatives of the disorder.

    Or, to be more precise, the negatives of having to put up with someone with  ADD. The underlining tones are that people with ADD are tiresome, irritating, unruly. But, damnit, they’re going to be helped. Helped being regulated to making people with ADD more normal, behaving within social constraints, etc.

    The emphasis isn’t on whether the person in question wants help, let alone the help of the Secondhand sufferer. The person with a disability is pushed to the background because their condition is “hurting” them. Hurting the person with a disability as defined as “being a burden or irritation for an able bodied person, typically a family member, coworker, or friend.”

    So, what do these Secondhand Sufferers complain about anyway?

    My AD/HD Child Won’t Do His/Her Homework,Chores, or What I Tell Them to!

    First off, this complaint assumes that a child’s disability is the cause of the problem. Why mention it at all? Children independent of disability may be disobedient.

    And the solution? Be stricter and enforce discipline more. This delves into the pseudosceptical belief that children with ADD don’t really have a disability, they’re just undisciplined. In addition, this tactic doesn’t address the why of the child’s behavior, because it’s just their ADD, right? Well, no, not necessarily.

    In my case, if someone wants me to do something they need to tell me: why they want it done, when they want it done by, why the hell I should be the one doing it, and who it impacts and how. Sorry, but I’m not going to waste my time and energy on something that I don’t see as important.

    X Cures/Treats Y

    Alright, there’s lots that’s been said already on why this isn’t okay. So, why is this relevant to a discussion of Secondhand Sufferers? Because many of these people are parents who may implement these “treatments.” Again, there is no statement as to whether the person with a disability accepts the treatment or is in a position to denigh it.

    This is particularly dangerous in regards to diet changes to treat symptoms. Diet changes should be talked over with a doctor, not accepted because someone on the Internet claims that sugar causes hyperactivity, gluten causes autism, etc. In regards to children, they most likely do not have the skills, knowledge or finances to prepare their own healthy, balanced meals and may be forced to eat a questionable diet or starve.

    He/She Won’t Do Anything, Stays on the Couch All the Time, etc.

    More common with pain disorders, mobility limitations, depression, chronic fatigue, and other conditions that limit a person’s energy or mobility, this complaint assumes that the person in question doesn’t need this additional down time. For anyone that thinks lying around is fun: bedsores hurt, boredom is often, and bathroom and eating tasks are fucking hard in a stationary position.

    In addition, the Secondhand Sufferer blames the person with a disability for the Secondhand Sufferer not going out or doing X activity. The Secondhand Sufferer doesn’t just do this activity by/for themselves despite being perfectly capable of doing so.

    And the person with a disability already feels bad about being limited in their activities. This isn’t to say that the person wants to be pitied, but the activities he or she does do must be pretty damned important to them.

    How Not to be a Secondhand Sufferer

    That’s just 3 cases that I can relate where a non-disabled person has, in person, demonstrated that they “sufferer” because I have a disability. So, how should one behave to not end up sounding like a Secondhand Sufferer?

    1. When complaining about a person, don’t mention his/her disability. It isn’t relevant and is enforcing a stereotype of people with a disability. This is a person not a disability that is being talked about.
    2. Don’t suggest or enforce a treatment for a person unless you are this person’s physician. It assumes that you know what’s best, which isn’t the case and insinuates that the person’s symptoms somehow affect you.
    3. Don’t assume someone gets angry at you because of their mental illness. As surprising as it might be, people (even people with mental illness) have the right to be angry at you. Yeah, maybe you don’t understand why they would be angry, but that doesn’t mean their anger is wrong.
    4. Having to change your habits, work styles, or settings to accommodate another person isn’t a fucking hardship for a non-disabled person. I know doing things differently is scary, but just think of it as a learning experience.
    5. Believe a person when they say they need something. If it’s a few hours lying down, prescription pain killers, a larger font size, lactose-free meals, etc., just believe them. Telling a person that they’re making you do extra work, ruining family-time, not pulling their weight, lying or that it is “all in their head” isn’t constructive.

    Any other suggestions? Or Secondhand Sufferer sightings?

    Why Visual Impairment?


    2009 - 10.25

    Alright, the standard belief is that people who want equal access, rights, etc. are stereotypically people that fall into the group that are being marginalized. I am by no measure blind; my nearsightedness is easily corrected with glasses.

    I am an individual with behavioral, learning, and pain disorders that affect my interactions with society. Why not work to improve individuals like myself?

    And there’s lots of reasons why I’ve decided I want to help people with severe visual impairment first.

    First up, people that are severely visually impaired have it a hell of a lot worse than I do. One of my friends is completely blind with not even light perception (extremely rare despite this being the imagined picture of the typical blind individual); I can’t send him Vimeo videos about research he’d enjoy because it isn’t accessible  (there isn’t a textual play). Even something as basic as keep backpacks out of aisles so he won’t trip is difficult for many people to grasp.

    As one can conclude from my research, having a severe visual impairment greatly decreases the opportunities a person has. I never had to worry about whether I would be literate, attend college, and be educated enough to have a profession; I assumed that I just needed to work for it. If a child has a severe visual impairment, this isn’t the case and that depresses and disgusts me.

    Secondly, helping others with different abilities does help me and many others. I find it very difficult to use a touchscreen because of the amount of attention necessary; staring at computer screens will give me a migraine, but I have limited choice with GUIs.

    The drive for multimedia also excludes people with hearing impairments, easily fatigued individuals, and even those that simply are in a hurry.

    Thirdly, and probably most importantly, just because I’ve decided to help one marginalized groups doesn’t mean I’m going to say “tough shit” to anyone else. Despite the common belief, I am not required to make an exclusive decision. I want to include as many people as possible; this just happens to be the area that I’m starting from.